GBIL : Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

GBIL is a Alternative Market Short with LOW fees.

GBIL

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

FI Score

72 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GBIL vs BLOK

34% FI Score
  • blok
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs WDSCX

34% FI Score
  • wdscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Wells Fargo Discovery Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs LUEIX

34% FI Score
  • lueix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Martin Currie International Unconstrained Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs MAPBX

34% FI Score
  • mapbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MainStay MAP Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PSMCX

34% FI Score
  • psmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Principal SmallCap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PUBCX

34% FI Score
  • pubcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Dynamic Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs BEEAX

34% FI Score
  • beeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BlackRock Total Emerging Markets Fund Investor A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs BIAQX

34% FI Score
  • biaqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Brown Advisory Emerging Markets Select Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs BUFEX

34% FI Score
  • bufex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Buffalo Large Cap Fund

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs DQICX

34% FI Score
  • dqicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

BNY Mellon Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs CETAX

34% FI Score
  • cetax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Centerstone Investors Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs BISCX

34% FI Score
  • biscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

UBS U.S. Small Cap Growth Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs KFYP

34% FI Score
  • kfyp
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

KraneShares CICC China Leaders 100 Index ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs MFCAX

34% FI Score
  • mfcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Meridian Contrarian Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs MFMS

34% FI Score
  • mfms
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

MFAM Small-Cap Growth ETF

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs MJ

34% FI Score
  • mj
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs MLVGX

34% FI Score
  • mlvgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs EMCB

34% FI Score
  • emcb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs ARWOX

34% FI Score
  • arwox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2030 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs MPACX

34% FI Score
  • mpacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Matthews Asia Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo