Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Pioneer Global Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Polen Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Janus Henderson Adaptive Global Allocation Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
AllianzGI Global Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map