GABVX : Gabelli Value 25 Fund Class A

GABVX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Blend with HIGH fees.

GABVX

Gabelli Value 25 Fund Class A

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GABVX vs DURIX

31% FI Score
  • durix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

DWS ESG International Core Equity Fund - Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs GICPX

31% FI Score
  • gicpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs DUICX

31% FI Score
  • duicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Delaware Tax-Free USA Intermediate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs NMHYX

31% FI Score
  • nmhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Northern Multi-Manager High Yield Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs HDGE

31% FI Score
  • hdge
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF

Expenses: 3.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs ECSIX

31% FI Score
  • ecsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs HAFCX

31% FI Score
  • hafcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford Multi-Asset Income and Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs LZISX

31% FI Score
  • lzisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs FHESX

31% FI Score
  • fhesx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs TGMEX

31% FI Score
  • tgmex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

TCW Emerging Markets Multi-Asset Opportunities Fund N Share Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs FGFSX

31% FI Score
  • fgfsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Federated Select Total Return Bond Fund Service Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs FFTI

31% FI Score
  • ffti
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

FormulaFolios Tactical Income ETF

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs LTUSX

31% FI Score
  • ltusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs FCBCX

31% FI Score
  • fcbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Nuveen Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs EZNAX

31% FI Score
  • eznax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance National Limited Maturity Municipal Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs UBOT

31% FI Score
  • ubot
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs ETMBX

31% FI Score
  • etmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance AMT-Free Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs ESMAX

31% FI Score
  • esmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Invesco European Small Company Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs GIGSX

31% FI Score
  • gigsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Aberdeen International Equity Fund Institutional Service Class

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GABVX vs DUG

31% FI Score
  • dug
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Oil & Gas

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo