Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$GABIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- gctax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Goldman Sachs U.S. Tax-Managed Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- szne
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- msoix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
MainStay MacKay Common Stock Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- rdcex
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Columbia Disciplined Core Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- suwcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
DWS Core Equity Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lgvax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
ClearBridge Value Trust Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- rffc
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
RiverFront Dynamic US Flex-Cap ETF
Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- gssqx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Insights Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- mclrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Core Fund Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »