FUTS : Future Science Holdings Inc

FUTS is a Other Market with HIGH fees.

FUTS

Future Science Holdings Inc

FI Score

72 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,484 Other funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FUTS vs IBALX

41% FI Score
  • ibalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs IASBX

41% FI Score
  • iasbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Voya Short Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs RWW

41% FI Score
  • rww
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Invesco S&P Financials Revenue ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs GMAAX

41% FI Score
  • gmaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Diversified Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs PMLCX

41% FI Score
  • pmlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PIMCO Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs MTOKX

41% FI Score
  • mtokx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2025 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs AGRAX

41% FI Score
  • agrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Multi Asset Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs KAUAX

41% FI Score
  • kauax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Federated Kaufmann Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs PDI

41% FI Score
  • pdi
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund

Expenses: 3.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs CSCIX

41% FI Score
  • cscix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities Fund, Inc. Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs CSA

41% FI Score
  • csa
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

VictoryShares US Small Cap Volatility Wtd ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs EPSKX

41% FI Score
  • epskx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs AEMGX

41% FI Score
  • aemgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Acadian Emerging Markets Portfolio Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs IBUY

41% FI Score
  • ibuy
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

Amplify Online Retail ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs FRSIX

41% FI Score
  • frsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Franklin Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs ACCIX

41% FI Score
  • accix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Century Strategic Allocation: Conservative Fund I Class

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs JGVAX

41% FI Score
  • jgvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Global Value Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs ABWAX

41% FI Score
  • abwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AB All Market Total Return Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs ABRCX

41% FI Score
  • abrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FUTS vs AASMX

41% FI Score
  • aasmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo