Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$FSCSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 131 Sector Equity Technology funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fivg
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Defiance 5G Next Gen Connectivity ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- psct
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- skyy
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
First Trust Cloud Computing ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- igv
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- fsptx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Fidelity® Select Technology Portfolio
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- cibr
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- fbsox
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Fidelity® Select IT Services Portfolio
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- fselx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Fidelity® Select Semiconductors Portfolio
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- prscx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Technology
T. Rowe Price Science and Technology Fund
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »