Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$FPCGX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- nsgcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Columbia Select Large Cap Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- nacp
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- maaax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
MainStay Epoch U.S. All Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- qaacx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Federated MDT All Cap Core Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ectmx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Eaton Vance Dividend Builder Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- fmk
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
First Trust Mega Cap AlphaDEX Fund
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- mlvbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- msoax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
MainStay MacKay Common Stock Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jicax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan Intrepid Sustainable Equity Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »