FLHK : Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF

FLHK is a International Stocks Market China Stock with LOW fees.

FLHK

Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF

FI Score

65 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FLHK vs PFMAX

21% FI Score
  • pfmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Pacific Funds Small-Cap Growth Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs AHYVX

21% FI Score
  • ahyvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century High-Yield Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs MHFCX

21% FI Score
  • mhfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 2.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs JSVTX

21% FI Score
  • jsvtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value Fund Class T

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs NTHEX

21% FI Score
  • nthex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Northeast Investors Trust

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs HWGAX

21% FI Score
  • hwgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs HEOZX

21% FI Score
  • heozx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Highland Long/Short Equity Fund Class Z

Expenses: 2.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs FMPCX

21% FI Score
  • fmpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs ATPAX

21% FI Score
  • atpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Aquila Three Peaks High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs DHQIX

21% FI Score
  • dhqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Day Hagan Logix Smart Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs GRRAX

21% FI Score
  • grrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

James Alpha Macro Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs BFONX

21% FI Score
  • bfonx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Biondo Focus Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs BMAAX

21% FI Score
  • bmaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Sterling Capital Maryland Intermediate Tax-Free Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs PCI

21% FI Score
  • pci
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PIMCO Dynamic Credit and Mortgage Income Fund

Expenses: 4.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs NCBVX

21% FI Score
  • ncbvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

PGIM QMA Mid-Cap Value Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs ARSKX

21% FI Score
  • arskx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Archer Stock Fund

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs ALHCX

21% FI Score
  • alhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AB Limited Duration High Income Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs PFICX

21% FI Score
  • pficx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs LPFCX

21% FI Score
  • lpfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FLHK vs NEFHX

21% FI Score
  • nefhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo