Diversification Rating
6 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$FLAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- caeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- cbon
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
VanEck Vectors ChinaAMC China Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pfuax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class A
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgirx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Polen Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- cfstx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Commerce Short Term Government Fund
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgsbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- colnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia Strategic New York Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- com
- ETF
- Commodities
- Broad
Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- conax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia U.S. Social Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- crmsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
CRM Small Cap Value Fund Class Investor
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- crscx
- Mutual Fund
- Commodities
- Broad
Credit Suisse Commodity Return Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- cwsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ryvlx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Leveraged Equities
Rydex NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »
- sdmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sempx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Semper MBS Total Return Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- adoix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
ACM Dynamic Opportunity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- artlx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Artisan Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bfrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Fund Investor C shares
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dhmcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Diamond Hill Small Mid Cap Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »