FFRSX : Federated Floating Rate Strategic Income Fund Institutional Shares

FFRSX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with MODERATE fees.

FFRSX

Federated Floating Rate Strategic Income Fund Institutional Shares

FI Score

48 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FFRSX vs MECEX

22% FI Score
  • mecex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs OCMPX

22% FI Score
  • ocmpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs PEMBX

22% FI Score
  • pembx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs AADGX

22% FI Score
  • aadgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Aasgard Dividend Growth Small & Mid-Cap Fund No Load Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs AFALX

22% FI Score
  • afalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Applied Finance Core Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs AFGGX

22% FI Score
  • afggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs APGRX

22% FI Score
  • apgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs ARGMX

22% FI Score
  • argmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2060 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs BEECX

22% FI Score
  • beecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BlackRock Total Emerging Markets Fund Investor C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs BGIIX

22% FI Score
  • bgiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Brandes Global Equity Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs BOSCX

22% FI Score
  • boscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs PDREX

22% FI Score
  • pdrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Risk Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs CGAVX

22% FI Score
  • cgavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Causeway Global Absolute Return Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs CHNCX

21% FI Score
  • chncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Clough China Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs CRIEX

21% FI Score
  • criex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

CRM All Cap Value Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs PWDAX

21% FI Score
  • pwdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Power Dividend Index Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs RNCIX

21% FI Score
  • rncix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

RiverNorth Core Opportunity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs RYIUX

21% FI Score
  • ryiux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs SGACX

21% FI Score
  • sgacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus SGA Global Growth C Class

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FFRSX vs SMCP

21% FI Score
  • smcp
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo