Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
9 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$FFLDX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation Target-Date funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- brugx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
MFS Blended Research Value Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bvsix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Baywood Socially Responsible Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- dfdsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
DF Dent Small Cap Growth Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- lnycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia New York Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eagcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Focused Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ebncx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hnddx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Horizon Active Dividend Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bneqx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
UBS U.S. Sustainable Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- eitcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Parametric TABS Intermediate-Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »