FFHCX : Fidelity® Series Floating Rate High Income Fund

FFHCX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with LOW fees.

FFHCX

Fidelity® Series Floating Rate High Income Fund

FI Score

66 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FFHCX vs JJP

40% FI Score
  • jjp
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Precious Metals Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs DEMG

40% FI Score
  • demg
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Xtrackers FTSE Emerging Comprehensive Factor ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs EKWYX

40% FI Score
  • ekwyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Wells Fargo Precious Metals Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs SLLAX

40% FI Score
  • sllax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Fund Class F

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs SKNRX

40% FI Score
  • sknrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs SMYIX

40% FI Score
  • smyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

QS Global Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs DDIV

40% FI Score
  • ddiv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs DIEAX

40% FI Score
  • dieax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

BNY Mellon International Core Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs DILAX

40% FI Score
  • dilax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Davis International Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs DSEFX

40% FI Score
  • dsefx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Domini Impact Equity Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs EEMD

40% FI Score
  • eemd
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AAM S&P Emerging Markets High Dividend Value ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs EIFVX

40% FI Score
  • eifvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs EQIIX

40% FI Score
  • eqiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs JERIX

40% FI Score
  • jerix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Janus Henderson Global Real Estate Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs EWGS

40% FI Score
  • ewgs
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares MSCI Germany Small-Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs EYLD

40% FI Score
  • eyld
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs FDEM

40% FI Score
  • fdem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Fidelity Targeted Emerging Markets Factor ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs FFBQX

40% FI Score
  • ffbqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2065 Fund Class K6

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs FIDAX

40% FI Score
  • fidax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

John Hancock Financial Industries Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FFHCX vs FREAX

40% FI Score
  • freax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Nuveen Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo