• osfcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Plus Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• rypax
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Industrials

Rydex Transportation Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

• rytsx
• Mutual Fund
• Sector Equity
• Industrials

Rydex Transportation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

• uupsx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternative
• Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraEmerging Markets Fund Service Class

Expenses: 2.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

• nysax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Growth

Nysa Fund

Expenses: 4.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• pamvx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Blend

Pacific Advisors Mid Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 6.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• ogycx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Invesco High Yield Bond Factor Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• bxgcx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Barings Global High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• dchf
• ETF
• Money Market
• World

Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long USD vs. CHF Index

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

• dxstx
• Mutual Fund
• Alternative
• Inverse

Direxion Monthly 25+ Year Treasury Bear 1.35X Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »