FCSSX : Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FCSSX is a Commodities Market Broad with LOW fees.

FCSSX

Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FI Score

86 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSSX vs DHTRX

17% FI Score
  • dhtrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Centre Active U.S. Treasury Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs DROCX

17% FI Score
  • drocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Diamond Hill Research Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ECOLX

17% FI Score
  • ecolx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Riverbridge Eco Leaders® Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EIXIX

17% FI Score
  • eixix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ETABX

17% FI Score
  • etabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eventide Limited-Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ETCDX

17% FI Score
  • etcdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Eventide Dividend Opportunities Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ETCMX

17% FI Score
  • etcmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FGOCX

17% FI Score
  • fgocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Government Income Securities Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs GARBX

17% FI Score
  • garbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guinness Atkinson Renminbi Yuan & Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs GLLAX

17% FI Score
  • gllax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs GNDCX

17% FI Score
  • gndcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs GURCX

17% FI Score
  • gurcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs HSIEX

17% FI Score
  • hsiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Hussman Strategic International Fund

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs HYLD

17% FI Score
  • hyld
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

High Yield ETF

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ICMBX

17% FI Score
  • icmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Intrepid Capital Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ICONX

17% FI Score
  • iconx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

ICON Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ICOPX

17% FI Score
  • icopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ICTVX

17% FI Score
  • ictvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

ICON Utilities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs IIXAX

17% FI Score
  • iixax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LPBCX

17% FI Score
  • lpbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2025 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo