FCSSX : Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FCSSX is a Commodities Market Broad with LOW fees.

FCSSX

Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FI Score

86 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSSX vs LOUP

22% FI Score
  • loup
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Innovator Loup Frontier Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs CPATX

22% FI Score
  • cpatx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Counterpoint Tactical Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FPPAX

22% FI Score
  • fppax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Prudent Investor Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MALTX

22% FI Score
  • maltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Latin America Stock

BlackRock Latin America Fund, Inc. Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Latin America Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs BATT

22% FI Score
  • batt
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Amplify Advanced Battery Metals and Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs GREAX

22% FI Score
  • greax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs KARS

22% FI Score
  • kars
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs DPTAX

22% FI Score
  • dptax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

BNY Mellon Tax Managed Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MDGRX

22% FI Score
  • mdgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MGTCX

22% FI Score
  • mgtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Transamerica Mid Cap Growth C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EHGAX

22% FI Score
  • ehgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Hexavest Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EPGFX

22% FI Score
  • epgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

EuroPac Gold Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EPVIX

22% FI Score
  • epvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

EuroPac International Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LZSMX

22% FI Score
  • lzsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LVLAX

22% FI Score
  • lvlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Low Volatility Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs AFLEX

22% FI Score
  • aflex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RAANX

22% FI Score
  • raanx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Altegris/AACA Opportunistic Real Estate Fund N

Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RRGCX

22% FI Score
  • rrgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MILAX

22% FI Score
  • milax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Mirae Asset Asia Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RGNCX

22% FI Score
  • rgncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Victory Global Natural Resources Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo