FCSSX : Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FCSSX is a Commodities Market Broad with LOW fees.

FCSSX

Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FI Score

86 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSSX vs KMED

31% FI Score
  • kmed
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

KraneShares Emerging Markets Healthcare Index ETF

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LCNIX

31% FI Score
  • lcnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Lazard International Equity Concentrated Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PNVAX

31% FI Score
  • pnvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Putnam International Capital Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RCOCX

31% FI Score
  • rcocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Victory RS Large Cap Alpha Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PQSCX

31% FI Score
  • pqscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs TEMMX

31% FI Score
  • temmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RFEM

31% FI Score
  • rfem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RIOCX

31% FI Score
  • riocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RMBKX

31% FI Score
  • rmbkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RPMVX

31% FI Score
  • rpmvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Reinhart Mid Cap PMV Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RPXIX

31% FI Score
  • rpxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

RiverPark Large Growth Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SEBFX

31% FI Score
  • sebfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SEFIX

31% FI Score
  • sefix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

SEI Institutional International Trust International Fixed Income Fund Class F

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SEMIX

31% FI Score
  • semix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Semper Short Duration Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SINBX

31% FI Score
  • sinbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Federated Strategic Income Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SINCX

31% FI Score
  • sincx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Federated Strategic Income Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SIRAX

31% FI Score
  • sirax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Sierra Tactical All Asset Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SMPIX

31% FI Score
  • smpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Semiconductor UltraSector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SMRSX

31% FI Score
  • smrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SNIGX

31% FI Score
  • snigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Sit Large Cap Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo