FCSSX : Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FCSSX is a Commodities Market Broad with LOW fees.

FCSSX

Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FI Score

86 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSSX vs ASVIX

48% FI Score
  • asvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

American Century Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs OPCAX

48% FI Score
  • opcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FYC

48% FI Score
  • fyc
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ANBEX

48% FI Score
  • anbex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Funds Strategic Bond Fund Class F-1

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ANBAX

48% FI Score
  • anbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Funds Strategic Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs JBLBX

48% FI Score
  • jblbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class B

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MITCX

48% FI Score
  • mitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Massachusetts Investors Trust Class C

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs OIGCX

48% FI Score
  • oigcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MISNX

48% FI Score
  • misnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

BMO Pyrford International Stock Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs WTMF

48% FI Score
  • wtmf
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Future

WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs OCIO

48% FI Score
  • ocio
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ClearShares OCIO ETF

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MIGDX

48% FI Score
  • migdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS Massachusetts Investors Growth Stock Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LSDRX

48% FI Score
  • lsdrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund A Class

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs ARTGX

48% FI Score
  • artgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Artisan Global Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FNARX

48% FI Score
  • fnarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Fidelity® Select Natural Resources Portfolio

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs BAEIX

48% FI Score
  • baeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PXI

48% FI Score
  • pxi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs NWFAX

48% FI Score
  • nwfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs USNYX

48% FI Score
  • usnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA New York Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs OARLX

48% FI Score
  • oarlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Oakmark Select Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo