FCSSX : Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FCSSX is a Commodities Market Broad with LOW fees.

FCSSX

Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FI Score

86 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSSX vs HERO

48% FI Score
  • hero
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Global X Video Games & Esports ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs OPCAX

48% FI Score
  • opcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs BAEIX

48% FI Score
  • baeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs GENY

48% FI Score
  • geny
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Principal Millennials Index ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs WTMF

48% FI Score
  • wtmf
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Future

WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EQRR

48% FI Score
  • eqrr
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MNA

48% FI Score
  • mna
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs HMJIX

48% FI Score
  • hmjix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Hartford Municipal Short Duration Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PAREX

48% FI Score
  • parex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

T. Rowe Price Real Estate Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs HFMRX

48% FI Score
  • hfmrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

The Hartford MidCap Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SDOW

48% FI Score
  • sdow
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs USNYX

48% FI Score
  • usnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA New York Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs TGVAX

48% FI Score
  • tgvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Thornburg International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MSGGX

48% FI Score
  • msggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund Legacy Class

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FLRSX

48% FI Score
  • flrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2030 Retirement Target Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FNYIX

48% FI Score
  • fnyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Franklin New York Tax Free Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs OAKWX

48% FI Score
  • oakwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Oakmark Global Select Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs NUGT

48% FI Score
  • nugt
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X Shares

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PXI

48% FI Score
  • pxi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs NSTAX

48% FI Score
  • nstax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Neuberger Berman Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo