FCSSX : Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FCSSX is a Commodities Market Broad with LOW fees.

FCSSX

Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FI Score

86 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSSX vs FESOX

49% FI Score
  • fesox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

First Eagle Overseas Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FOIPX

49% FI Score
  • foipx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Tributary Income Fund Class Institutional Plus

Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SIGVX

49% FI Score
  • sigvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Virtus Seix U.S. Government Securities Ultra-Short Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FLRSX

48% FI Score
  • flrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2030 Retirement Target Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MFRBX

48% FI Score
  • mfrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Research Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs FLQH

48% FI Score
  • flqh
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Franklin LibertyQ International Equity Hedged ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PRISX

48% FI Score
  • prisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MACVX

48% FI Score
  • macvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Conservative Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs MIAAX

48% FI Score
  • miaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

MFS Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LTNYX

48% FI Score
  • ltnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term New York Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs EWJV

48% FI Score
  • ewjv
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF

Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs TMCTX

48% FI Score
  • tmctx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Touchstone Mid Cap Fund Class Z

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SDOW

48% FI Score
  • sdow
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs AIZAX

48% FI Score
  • aizax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

AB International Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs USNYX

48% FI Score
  • usnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA New York Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs OAKWX

48% FI Score
  • oakwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Oakmark Global Select Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PRTNX

48% FI Score
  • prtnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

PIMCO Real Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LZHYX

48% FI Score
  • lzhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PYCGX

48% FI Score
  • pycgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs BIIEX

48% FI Score
  • biiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Brandes International Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo