FCSSX : Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FCSSX is a Commodities Market Broad with LOW fees.

FCSSX

Fidelity® Series Commodity Strategy Fund

FI Score

86 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

10 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSSX vs JPGB

52% FI Score
  • jpgb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

JPMorgan Global Bond Opportunities ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs JPSE

52% FI Score
  • jpse
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

JPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs JSISX

52% FI Score
  • jsisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Unconstrained Debt Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs JTIAX

52% FI Score
  • jtiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

JPMorgan High Yield Municipal Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs KLCD

52% FI Score
  • klcd
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

KFA Large Cap Quality Dividend Index ETF

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs KTRAX

52% FI Score
  • ktrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

DWS Global Income Builder Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LFEQ

52% FI Score
  • lfeq
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

VanEck Vectors Long/Flat Trend ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LGMAX

52% FI Score
  • lgmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs LIBAX

52% FI Score
  • libax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Columbia Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SBBIX

52% FI Score
  • sbbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Schroder Total Return Fixed Income Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PNOPX

52% FI Score
  • pnopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PPA

52% FI Score
  • ppa
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SCIU

52% FI Score
  • sciu
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Global X Scientific Beta US ETF

Expenses: 0.19% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PRPFX

52% FI Score
  • prpfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs PSET

52% FI Score
  • pset
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Principal Price Setters Index ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RPGEX

52% FI Score
  • rpgex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs RYT

52% FI Score
  • ryt
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SBIO

52% FI Score
  • sbio
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SCIEX

52% FI Score
  • sciex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Hartford Schroders International Stock Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSSX vs SDMAX

52% FI Score
  • sdmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund- Class A

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo