FCSCX : Franklin Adjustable U.S. Government Securities Fund Class C

FCSCX is a Bond Market Government Bond with HIGH fees.

FCSCX

Franklin Adjustable U.S. Government Securities Fund Class C

FI Score

32 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Government Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSCX vs EISDX

13% FI Score
  • eisdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Carillon ClariVest International Stock Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs MGPIX

13% FI Score
  • mgpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs LD

13% FI Score
  • ld
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Bloomberg Lead Subindex Total Return(SM) ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs MLSCX

13% FI Score
  • mlscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Aberdeen Focused U.S. Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs MSURX

13% FI Score
  • msurx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs NEOMX

13% FI Score
  • neomx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neiman Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs ABLCX

13% FI Score
  • ablcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs ACVVX

13% FI Score
  • acvvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AC Alternatives® Market Neutral Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 3.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs OBSOX

13% FI Score
  • obsox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Oberweis Small-Cap Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs AFAAX

13% FI Score
  • afaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Capital Income Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs AGFQX

13% FI Score
  • agfqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

361 Global Managed Futures Strategy Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs NARCX

13% FI Score
  • narcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Voya Multi-Manager International Small Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs APJAX

13% FI Score
  • apjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Aberdeen Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs APMAX

13% FI Score
  • apmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Master Allocation Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs ARMAX

13% FI Score
  • armax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

AllianzGI Global Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs PSPFX

13% FI Score
  • pspfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

U.S. Global Investors Global Resources Fund

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs OBEMX

13% FI Score
  • obemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Oberweis Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs SPABX

13% FI Score
  • spabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

SilverPepper Merger Arbitrage Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs ATVAX

13% FI Score
  • atvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Athena Behavioral Tactical Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSCX vs AVSAX

13% FI Score
  • avsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2040 Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo