FCSAX : Strategic Advisers® Core Fund

FCSAX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with LOW fees.

FCSAX

Strategic Advisers® Core Fund

FI Score

90 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

8 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare FCSAX vs PRMAX

48% FI Score
  • prmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Class A

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs MCHFX

48% FI Score
  • mchfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Matthews China Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs MDHIX

48% FI Score
  • mdhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs NLSAX

48% FI Score
  • nlsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs MNA

48% FI Score
  • mna
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs MRBCX

48% FI Score
  • mrbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MFS Total Return Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs EWJV

48% FI Score
  • ewjv
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF

Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs PRISX

48% FI Score
  • prisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs PYARX

48% FI Score
  • pyarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden Absolute Return Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs PYHRX

48% FI Score
  • pyhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden High Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs MINDX

48% FI Score
  • mindx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

Matthews India Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs MMHBX

48% FI Score
  • mmhbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal High Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs MTZIX

48% FI Score
  • mtzix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2055 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs MTMAX

48% FI Score
  • mtmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MainStay MacKay Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs JPEM

48% FI Score
  • jpem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

JPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs NETL

48% FI Score
  • netl
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs FSMB

48% FI Score
  • fsmb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs NVHCX

48% FI Score
  • nvhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs TNEAX

48% FI Score
  • tneax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare FCSAX vs LSDRX

48% FI Score
  • lsdrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund A Class

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs up duo thumbs down duo