Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$FASMX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ucagx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
USAA Cornerstone Aggressive Fund
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- aabpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Beacon Balanced Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ffsg
- ETF
- Allocation
- All-In-One
FormulaFolios Smart Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fbabx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AIG Active Allocation Fund Class B
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- igtax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Transamerica Dynamic Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- bcmpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- clerx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AdvisorOne CLS Growth and Income Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hbafx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Rational Strategic Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- eaeax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »