Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$EVFHX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- flarx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rfrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxtax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Diversified Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fricx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Floating Rate Strategic Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- shnax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AIG Flexible Credit Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- scfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dticx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Limited-Term Diversified Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dflcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- psrwx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Senior Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »