ESGS : Columbia Sustainable U.S. Equity Income ETF

ESGS is a US Stocks Market Large Value with LOW fees.

ESGS

Columbia Sustainable U.S. Equity Income ETF

FI Score

43 /100

Diversification Rating

2 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

7 /10

Market Score

0 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

0 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ESGS vs CNRG

40% FI Score
  • cnrg
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

SPDR Kensho Clean Power ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs HAHTX

40% FI Score
  • hahtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford High Yield Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs JHMU

40% FI Score
  • jhmu
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

John Hancock Multifactor Utilities ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs AIECX

39% FI Score
  • aiecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs FRNRX

39% FI Score
  • frnrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Franklin Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs STCCX

39% FI Score
  • stccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Principal Short-Term Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs JHMA

39% FI Score
  • jhma
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

John Hancock Multifactor Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs LNYAX

39% FI Score
  • lnyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia New York Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs FIHD

39% FI Score
  • fihd
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

UBS AG FI Enhanced Global High Yield ETN

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs MWHYX

39% FI Score
  • mwhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West High Yield Bond Fund Class M

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs PEFFX

39% FI Score
  • peffx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

PIMCO RAE PLUS EMG Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs ASFCX

39% FI Score
  • asfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs DPMZX

39% FI Score
  • dpmzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Connecticut Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs ATWCX

39% FI Score
  • atwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy Class C

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs RGHYX

39% FI Score
  • rghyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

RBC BlueBay High Yield Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs ASRAX

39% FI Score
  • asrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Invesco Global Real Estate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs MTQKX

39% FI Score
  • mtqkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2035 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs HEWI

39% FI Score
  • hewi
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Italy ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs SOXS

39% FI Score
  • soxs
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ESGS vs GYLD

39% FI Score
  • gyld
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo