EJUL : Innovator MSCI Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July

EJUL is a Other Market Options-based with MODERATE fees.

EJUL

Innovator MSCI Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July

FI Score

52 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,484 Other Options-based funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EJUL vs DLLDX

25% FI Score
  • dlldx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

DoubleLine Long Duration Total Return Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs DFLCX

25% FI Score
  • dflcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs RYSPX

25% FI Score
  • ryspx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Rydex S&P 500 Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs GOLDX

25% FI Score
  • goldx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Gabelli Gold Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs THNDX

25% FI Score
  • thndx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Thornburg New Mexico Intermediate Municipal Fund Class D

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs EFGIX

25% FI Score
  • efgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Focused Global Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs GRRSX

25% FI Score
  • grrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

James Alpha Macro Portfolio Class S Shares

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs HFHRX

25% FI Score
  • hfhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs PTRGX

25% FI Score
  • ptrgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs COGAX

25% FI Score
  • cogax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Select Global Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs AZSAX

25% FI Score
  • azsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

American Beacon Zebra Small Cap Equity Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs LVAFX

25% FI Score
  • lvafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs CHAIX

25% FI Score
  • chaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Chase Growth Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs PAJZX

25% FI Score
  • pajzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Global Dynamic Bond Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs ECBSX

25% FI Score
  • ecbsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs SHTCX

25% FI Score
  • shtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs MSYPX

25% FI Score
  • msypx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust High Yield Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs JHJAX

25% FI Score
  • jhjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

John Hancock ESG Large Cap Core Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs EKGCX

25% FI Score
  • ekgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs BAEDX

25% FI Score
  • baedx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock Emerging Markets Flexible Dynamic Bond Portfolio Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo