EJUL : Innovator MSCI Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July

EJUL is a Other Market Options-based with MODERATE fees.

EJUL

Innovator MSCI Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July

FI Score

52 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,484 Other Options-based funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EJUL vs DNFGX

25% FI Score
  • dnfgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Dunham Focused Large Cap Growth Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs DRIV

25% FI Score
  • driv
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs DTGRX

25% FI Score
  • dtgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs EADOX

25% FI Score
  • eadox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs ECBSX

25% FI Score
  • ecbsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs ECEAX

25% FI Score
  • eceax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs EFGIX

25% FI Score
  • efgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Focused Global Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs PGTDX

25% FI Score
  • pgtdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Putnam Global Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs PNGAX

25% FI Score
  • pngax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Putnam International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs EISEX

25% FI Score
  • eisex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Eaton Vance Special Equities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs PDEZX

25% FI Score
  • pdezx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Equity Opportunities Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs EMEAX

25% FI Score
  • emeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs RYSPX

25% FI Score
  • ryspx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Rydex S&P 500 Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs LMSCX

25% FI Score
  • lmscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Municipal Bond Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs TPLNX

25% FI Score
  • tplnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Timothy Plan Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs EPGIX

25% FI Score
  • epgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

EuroPac Gold Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs ESGEX

25% FI Score
  • esgex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Reynders McVeigh Core Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs PGSAX

25% FI Score
  • pgsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Global Advantage Strategy Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs ESVIX

25% FI Score
  • esvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Small-Cap Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EJUL vs ETEGX

25% FI Score
  • etegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo