Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$EICOX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,038 International Stocks Emerging Markets funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- nugax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen Santa Barbara Global Dividend Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nwgyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Nationwide Ziegler Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- aztcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Aquila Tax-Free Trust of Arizona Class C
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- baegx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BMO Global Low Volatility Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ordnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
North Square Oak Ridge Dividend Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ofinx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Intermediate Bond Factor Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- myccx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
MainStay MacKay U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- bglcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Global Equity
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »
- mafix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Future
Abbey Capital Multi Asset Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »