EFAS : Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF

EFAS is a International Stocks Market Large Value with MODERATE fees.

EFAS

Global X MSCI SuperDividend EAFE ETF

FI Score

42 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

4 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,471 International Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare EFAS vs HYLD

17% FI Score
  • hyld
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

High Yield ETF

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs ICMBX

17% FI Score
  • icmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Intrepid Capital Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs ICONX

17% FI Score
  • iconx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

ICON Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs ICOPX

17% FI Score
  • icopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs ICTVX

17% FI Score
  • ictvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

ICON Utilities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs IIXAX

17% FI Score
  • iixax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs LPBCX

17% FI Score
  • lpbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2025 Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs GARBX

17% FI Score
  • garbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guinness Atkinson Renminbi Yuan & Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs IOCZX

17% FI Score
  • ioczx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ICON Risk-Managed Balanced Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs GLLAX

17% FI Score
  • gllax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aberdeen Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs GNDCX

17% FI Score
  • gndcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs UTPIX

17% FI Score
  • utpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs LDPAX

17% FI Score
  • ldpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Leland Thomson Reuters Private Equity Buyout Index Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs QMLAX

17% FI Score
  • qmlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Quantified Market Leaders Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs QCBGX

17% FI Score
  • qcbgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Federated MDT Balanced Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs RYVTX

17% FI Score
  • ryvtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs SUPCX

17% FI Score
  • supcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

DWS Multi-Asset Growth Allocation Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs TRSDX

17% FI Score
  • trsdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

TorrayResolute Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs PRVDX

17% FI Score
  • prvdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare EFAS vs RFBAX

17% FI Score
  • rfbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Davis Government Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo