ECSMX : Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund Class C

ECSMX is a US Stocks Market Small Growth with HIGH fees.

ECSMX

Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

16 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECSMX vs TEFQX

18% FI Score
  • tefqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Firsthand Technology Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs THYCX

18% FI Score
  • thycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Touchstone High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs TMNAX

18% FI Score
  • tmnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Counterpoint Tactical Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs TNACX

18% FI Score
  • tnacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs UIPIX

18% FI Score
  • uipix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds UltraShort Mid-Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs ULE

18% FI Score
  • ule
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Ultra Euro

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs USERX

18% FI Score
  • userx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

U.S. Global Investors Gold and Precious Metals Fund

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs VRECX

18% FI Score
  • vrecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2030 Fund Class CX

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs WHYCX

18% FI Score
  • whycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Wells Fargo High Yield Municipal Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs XMPT

18% FI Score
  • xmpt
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

VanEck Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs CARZ

18% FI Score
  • carz
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

First Trust NASDAQ Global Auto Index Fund

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs AIAFX

18% FI Score
  • aiafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Aberdeen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs AUBAX

18% FI Score
  • aubax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco World Bond Factor Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs ECMDX

18% FI Score
  • ecmdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance Maryland Municipal Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs DUGCX

18% FI Score
  • dugcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Delaware Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs FLRTX

18% FI Score
  • flrtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2030 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs LPCPX

18% FI Score
  • lpcpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2050 Porfolio Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs LPHIX

18% FI Score
  • lphix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2045 Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs COGCX

18% FI Score
  • cogcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Select Global Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECSMX vs GIRAX

18% FI Score
  • girax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Goldman Sachs International Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo