ECDAX : Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund Class A

ECDAX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

ECDAX

Ashmore Emerging Markets Corporate Income Fund Class A

FI Score

23 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECDAX vs ARWOX

34% FI Score
  • arwox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2030 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs JSJAX

34% FI Score
  • jsjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

John Hancock Funds Small Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs ACOAX

34% FI Score
  • acoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Century Strategic Allocation: Moderate Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs FGSAX

34% FI Score
  • fgsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Federated MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs FNCAX

34% FI Score
  • fncax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Franklin NextStep Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs NGCCX

34% FI Score
  • ngccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Columbia Greater China Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs FTXG

34% FI Score
  • ftxg
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs LUEIX

34% FI Score
  • lueix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Martin Currie International Unconstrained Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs MAPBX

34% FI Score
  • mapbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MainStay MAP Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs HDAVX

34% FI Score
  • hdavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Dividend & Income Builder Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs GHAYX

34% FI Score
  • ghayx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

VanEck Global Hard Assets Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs MFCAX

34% FI Score
  • mfcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Meridian Contrarian Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs MFMS

34% FI Score
  • mfms
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

MFAM Small-Cap Growth ETF

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs EEMCX

34% FI Score
  • eemcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Columbia Emerging Markets Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs MJ

34% FI Score
  • mj
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs MLVGX

34% FI Score
  • mlvgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs MPACX

34% FI Score
  • mpacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Matthews Asia Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs MRGR

34% FI Score
  • mrgr
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

ProShares Merger ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs GSCOX

34% FI Score
  • gscox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth Insights Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECDAX vs MSEIX

34% FI Score
  • mseix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AMG Managers Special Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo