ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs AMMAX

19% FI Score
  • ammax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AllianzGI Emerging Markets Consumer Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARYMX

19% FI Score
  • arymx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

American Century Global Real Estate Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AYBAX

19% FI Score
  • aybax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AllianzGI High Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GSCKX

19% FI Score
  • gsckx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PGKZX

19% FI Score
  • pgkzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

PGIM Jennison Technology Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BOIL

19% FI Score
  • boil
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CSMOX

19% FI Score
  • csmox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Chiron SMid Opportunities Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CAJAX

19% FI Score
  • cajax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Columbia Contrarian Asia Pacific Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CCGEX

19% FI Score
  • ccgex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs UEUR

19% FI Score
  • ueur
  • ETF
  • Money Market
  • World

Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long EUR vs. USD Index

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CHBCX

19% FI Score
  • chbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calvert High Yield Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PUFBX

18% FI Score
  • pufbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

PGIM Jennison Financial Services Fund- Class B

Expenses: 2.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CMFIX

18% FI Score
  • cmfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

CM Advisors Fixed Income Fund

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CPQIX

18% FI Score
  • cpqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Counterpoint Long-Short Equity Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RYVNX

18% FI Score
  • ryvnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SDMGX

18% FI Score
  • sdmgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Sit Developing Markets Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SPDCX

18% FI Score
  • spdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

DWS Multi-Asset Conservative Allocation Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs DNHYX

18% FI Score
  • dnhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Dunham High-Yield Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ECRRX

18% FI Score
  • ecrrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EMDIX

18% FI Score
  • emdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated Emerging Market Debt Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo