ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs NCECX

25% FI Score
  • ncecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Neuberger Berman Greater China Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GRES

25% FI Score
  • gres
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

IQ Global Resources ETF

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NFTY

25% FI Score
  • nfty
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GTAJX

25% FI Score
  • gtajx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2030 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HFHRX

25% FI Score
  • hfhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NWHKX

25% FI Score
  • nwhkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Bailard International Equities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HLMOX

25% FI Score
  • hlmox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PAJZX

25% FI Score
  • pajzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Global Dynamic Bond Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MBNBX

25% FI Score
  • mbnbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Balanced Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PGTDX

25% FI Score
  • pgtdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Putnam Global Technology Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MGBDX

25% FI Score
  • mgbdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS Global Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MBACX

25% FI Score
  • mbacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ACSKX

25% FI Score
  • acskx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century Short Duration Fund C Class

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ACVUX

25% FI Score
  • acvux
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century International Value Fund I Class

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AGEPX

25% FI Score
  • agepx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Beacon Frontier Markets Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AGSAX

25% FI Score
  • agsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AB Unconstrained Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GSICX

24% FI Score
  • gsicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs International Equity ESG Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PCAIX

24% FI Score
  • pcaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PGIM California Muni Income Fund-Class B

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BIZD

24% FI Score
  • bizd
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

VanEck Vectors BDC Income ETF

Expenses: 9.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BXGYX

24% FI Score
  • bxgyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Global High Yield Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo