ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs HITIX

26% FI Score
  • hitix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Schroders Securitized Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HRLCX

26% FI Score
  • hrlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

The Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PIPTX

26% FI Score
  • piptx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IIBCX

26% FI Score
  • iibcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco International Core Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IMNAX

26% FI Score
  • imnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Transamerica Global Equity Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IRFCX

26% FI Score
  • irfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Cohen & Steers International Realty Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MFFRX

26% FI Score
  • mffrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2050 Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IRSAX

26% FI Score
  • irsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Ivy Securian Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JINTX

26% FI Score
  • jintx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Johnson International Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JOAIX

26% FI Score
  • joaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

JOHCM Asia Ex-Japan Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JOSAX

26% FI Score
  • josax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

JOHCM International Small Cap Equity Fund Class II

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JRMTX

26% FI Score
  • jrmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Janus Henderson International Managed Volatility Fund Class T

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs WEACX

26% FI Score
  • weacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs POBCX

26% FI Score
  • pobcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PQICX

26% FI Score
  • pqicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PROAX

26% FI Score
  • proax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Probabilities Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs VIESX

26% FI Score
  • viesx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Virtus KAR Emerging Markets Small-Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs UTACX

26% FI Score
  • utacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aquila Tax-Free Fund For Utah Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs REBAX

26% FI Score
  • rebax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SSG

26% FI Score
  • ssg
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Semiconductors

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo