ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs MWUSX

28% FI Score
  • mwusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Metropolitan West Ultra Short Bond Fund Class M

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GSP

28% FI Score
  • gsp
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

iPath S&P GSCI Total Return Index ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GTASX

28% FI Score
  • gtasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2050 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GTHCX

28% FI Score
  • gthcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Invesco Health Care Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NIB

28% FI Score
  • nib
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Bloomberg Cocoa Subindex Total Return(SM) ETN

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HEMAX

28% FI Score
  • hemax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HEMTX

28% FI Score
  • hemtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Fund Class T

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NRBAX

28% FI Score
  • nrbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs OMICX

28% FI Score
  • omicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

JPMorgan Municipal Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RDCLX

28% FI Score
  • rdclx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Limited Duration Credit Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs WFGBX

28% FI Score
  • wfgbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MASGX

28% FI Score
  • masgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Matthews Asia ESG Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MCEGX

28% FI Score
  • mcegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BlackRock Long-Horizon Equity Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MSUSX

28% FI Score
  • msusx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. U.S. Real Estate Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NAPIX

28% FI Score
  • napix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Voya Multi-Manager International Small Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ADVNX

28% FI Score
  • advnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

North Square Strategic Income Fund I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AFJAX

28% FI Score
  • afjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

AllianzGI International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AHYCX

28% FI Score
  • ahycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AZENX

28% FI Score
  • azenx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AQR Emerging Defensive Style Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AIIQ

27% FI Score
  • aiiq
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

AI Powered International Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo