ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs MMRCX

33% FI Score
  • mmrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Moderate Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ETGIX

33% FI Score
  • etgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

Eaton Vance Greater India Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EUGDX

33% FI Score
  • eugdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Morgan Stanley Europe Opportunity Fund Inc. Class I

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MSDIX

33% FI Score
  • msdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay MacKay Unconstrained Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MSEAX

33% FI Score
  • mseax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MainStay MacKay International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AFTY

33% FI Score
  • afty
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MBNAX

33% FI Score
  • mbnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MGQIX

33% FI Score
  • mgqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PTUZX

33% FI Score
  • ptuzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PIMCO Total Return Fund IV Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PYZ

33% FI Score
  • pyz
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Invesco DWA Basic Materials Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MFLDX

33% FI Score
  • mfldx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Marketfield Fund Class I

Expenses: 2.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RFRAX

33% FI Score
  • rfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Floating Rate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IBLLX

33% FI Score
  • ibllx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HWHCX

33% FI Score
  • hwhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hotchkis & Wiley High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MTZKX

33% FI Score
  • mtzkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2055 Series Class K

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NAMFX

33% FI Score
  • namfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs JMIIX

33% FI Score
  • jmiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Janus Henderson International Managed Volatility Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs SAA

33% FI Score
  • saa
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra SmallCap600

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RYUCX

33% FI Score
  • ryucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Rydex Inverse S&P 500® Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LMEAX

33% FI Score
  • lmeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

QS International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo