ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs BLPIX

33% FI Score
  • blpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Bull Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GREZX

33% FI Score
  • grezx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

GuideStone Funds Global Real Estate Securities Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PVSBX

33% FI Score
  • pvsbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Capital Spectrum Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GSHCX

33% FI Score
  • gshcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GSGOX

33% FI Score
  • gsgox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Goldman Sachs Government Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GTCIX

33% FI Score
  • gtcix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Glenmede Quantitative International Equity Portfolio

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MCFRX

33% FI Score
  • mcfrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Pioneer Multi-Asset Ultrashort Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MCGCX

33% FI Score
  • mcgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RAGTX

33% FI Score
  • ragtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

AllianzGI Technology Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PVSCX

33% FI Score
  • pvscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Capital Spectrum Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MCRO

33% FI Score
  • mcro
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

IQ Hedge Macro Tracker ETF

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PWJCX

33% FI Score
  • pwjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

PGIM Jennison International Opportunities Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PXQ

33% FI Score
  • pxq
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Invesco Dynamic Networking ETF

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MDPCX

33% FI Score
  • mdpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

BlackRock Asian Dragon Fund,Inc.Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MECDX

33% FI Score
  • mecdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HFBAX

33% FI Score
  • hfbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Highland Fixed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NREAX

33% FI Score
  • nreax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ICLLX

33% FI Score
  • icllx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Asset Allocation Conservative Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MMIFX

33% FI Score
  • mmifx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Michigan Intermediate Municipal Trust Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MMRBX

33% FI Score
  • mmrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Moderate Allocation Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo