ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs CAPCX

33% FI Score
  • capcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Federated Capital Income Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ABHIX

33% FI Score
  • abhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

American Century High-Yield Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AHSZX

33% FI Score
  • ahszx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Alger Health Sciences Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARAAX

33% FI Score
  • araax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Horizon Active Risk Assist® Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ARKF

33% FI Score
  • arkf
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

ARK Fintech Innovation ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AROCX

33% FI Score
  • arocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2045 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ASHCX

33% FI Score
  • ashcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AllianzGI Short Duration High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ATTAX

33% FI Score
  • attax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Tax-Aware Fixed Income Opportunities Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BAHAX

33% FI Score
  • bahax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Brown Advisory WMC Strategic European Equity Fund Advisor Shares

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs KNAB

33% FI Score
  • knab
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index Inverse ETNs

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IVFCX

33% FI Score
  • ivfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Federated International Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PDLEX

33% FI Score
  • pdlex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Prudential Day One 2060 Fund Class R2

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BDKAX

33% FI Score
  • bdkax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Braddock Multi-Strategy Income Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CAPBX

33% FI Score
  • capbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Federated Capital Income Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PGMAX

33% FI Score
  • pgmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs TEPCX

33% FI Score
  • tepcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

American Funds Tax-Exempt Preservation Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PODCX

33% FI Score
  • podcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CHICX

33% FI Score
  • chicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Credit Suisse Floating Rate High Income Fund C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PSANX

33% FI Score
  • psanx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Fund Class I-3

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs QTUM

33% FI Score
  • qtum
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Defiance Quantum ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo