ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs EQIAX

33% FI Score
  • eqiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs BLCN

33% FI Score
  • blcn
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Reality Shares Nasdaq NexGen Economy ETF

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs EVGBC

33% FI Score
  • evgbc
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Income Builder NextShares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FBDIX

33% FI Score
  • fbdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Franklin Biotechnology Discovery Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FIGIX

33% FI Score
  • figix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated U.S. Government Securities Fund 2-5 Year Service Shares

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FITSX

33% FI Score
  • fitsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Government Income Trust Service Shares

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FLM

33% FI Score
  • flm
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FMIEX

33% FI Score
  • fmiex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Wasatch Global Value Fund™ Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FOCIX

33% FI Score
  • focix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Fairholme Focused Income Fund

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FPBFX

33% FI Score
  • fpbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Fidelity® Pacific Basin Fund

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs FRSAX

33% FI Score
  • frsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated Floating Rate Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GAZ

33% FI Score
  • gaz
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Natural Gas Subindex Total ReturnSM ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GIFPX

33% FI Score
  • gifpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Floating Rate Strategies Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GPROX

33% FI Score
  • gprox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HGHTX

33% FI Score
  • hghtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

The Hartford Healthcare Fund Class R5

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HNCSX

33% FI Score
  • hncsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Hartford International Growth Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HRLAX

33% FI Score
  • hrlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs HSDCX

33% FI Score
  • hsdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Short Duration Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs IHFIX

33% FI Score
  • ihfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Integrity High Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PBJ

33% FI Score
  • pbj
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

Invesco Dynamic Food & Beverage ETF

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo