ECASX : Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

ECASX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

ECASX

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ECASX vs PGPCX

36% FI Score
  • pgpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

George Putnam Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs POVBX

36% FI Score
  • povbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam International Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PGRCX

36% FI Score
  • pgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PCGNX

36% FI Score
  • pcgnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

PIMCO GNMA and Government Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CHAU

36% FI Score
  • chau
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2X Shares

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CHIK

36% FI Score
  • chik
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Information Technology ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PHYL

36% FI Score
  • phyl
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MTMBX

36% FI Score
  • mtmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MainStay MacKay Total Return Bond Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs LUTCX

36% FI Score
  • lutcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Columbia U.S. Treasury Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs MIABX

36% FI Score
  • miabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

MFS Inflation-Adjusted Bond Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PICAX

36% FI Score
  • picax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Principal International Small Company Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs NAJPX

36% FI Score
  • najpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen New York Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CHTFX

36% FI Score
  • chtfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aquila Churchill Tax Free Fund of Kentucky Class A

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs CLIAX

36% FI Score
  • cliax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Invesco Income Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs PTLAX

36% FI Score
  • ptlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Low Duration Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RAAX

36% FI Score
  • raax
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

VanEck Vectors Real Asset Allocation ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs ROBT

36% FI Score
  • robt
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence and Robotics ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs RYVYX

36% FI Score
  • ryvyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs AHLCX

36% FI Score
  • ahlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare ECASX vs GLOSX

36% FI Score
  • glosx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Pioneer Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo