DLUSX : DoubleLine Ultra Short Bond Fund Class N

DLUSX is a Alternative Market Short with HIGH fees.

DLUSX

DoubleLine Ultra Short Bond Fund Class N

FI Score

32 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare DLUSX vs JLKLX

48% FI Score
  • jlklx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs JSOAX

48% FI Score
  • jsoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs FNARX

48% FI Score
  • fnarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Fidelity® Select Natural Resources Portfolio

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs PXI

48% FI Score
  • pxi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs EWJV

48% FI Score
  • ewjv
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF

Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs FCITX

48% FI Score
  • fcitx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Franklin Federal Intermediate-Term Tax-Free Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs GSBFX

48% FI Score
  • gsbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs FCAL

48% FI Score
  • fcal
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs TMCTX

48% FI Score
  • tmctx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Touchstone Mid Cap Fund Class Z

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs LZHYX

48% FI Score
  • lzhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard US Corporate Income Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs ANBAX

48% FI Score
  • anbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Funds Strategic Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs PSCHX

48% FI Score
  • pschx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

PGIM Jennison Small Company Fund- Class R2

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs MRIBX

48% FI Score
  • mribx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Research International Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs USNYX

48% FI Score
  • usnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA New York Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs COAVX

48% FI Score
  • coavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Columbia Overseas Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs MRICX

48% FI Score
  • mricx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Research International Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs MRBCX

48% FI Score
  • mrbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MFS Total Return Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs OPCAX

48% FI Score
  • opcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester California Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs EITTX

48% FI Score
  • eittx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS 10-to-20 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs MSGGX

48% FI Score
  • msggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Meridian Small Cap Growth Fund Legacy Class

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo