DLUSX : DoubleLine Ultra Short Bond Fund Class N

DLUSX is a Alternative Market Short with HIGH fees.

DLUSX

DoubleLine Ultra Short Bond Fund Class N

FI Score

32 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare DLUSX vs CHTRX

49% FI Score
  • chtrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Charter Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs MCGWX

49% FI Score
  • mcgwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Growth Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs ABRZX

49% FI Score
  • abrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs NUSA

49% FI Score
  • nusa
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs ANGLX

49% FI Score
  • anglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Angel Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund A Shares

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs PRESX

49% FI Score
  • presx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

T. Rowe Price European Stock Fund

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs XCEM

49% FI Score
  • xcem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF

Expenses: 0.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs COAVX

48% FI Score
  • coavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Columbia Overseas Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs LTXCX

48% FI Score
  • ltxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

American Funds Limited Term Tax Exempt Bond Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs BAGAX

48% FI Score
  • bagax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Brown Advisory Growth Equity Fund Advisor Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs NUMV

48% FI Score
  • numv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs EITTX

48% FI Score
  • eittx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Parametric TABS 10-to-20 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs PLADX

48% FI Score
  • pladx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pacific Funds Short Duration Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs FCAL

48% FI Score
  • fcal
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs MACVX

48% FI Score
  • macvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Conservative Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs USNYX

48% FI Score
  • usnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA New York Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs PRISX

48% FI Score
  • prisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs JLKLX

48% FI Score
  • jlklx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs EWJV

48% FI Score
  • ewjv
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF

Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare DLUSX vs GSBFX

48% FI Score
  • gsbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo