Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$DHAMX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- aivsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
American Funds Investment Company of America® Class A
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- plsax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Principal LargeCap S&P 500 Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- hgitx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Hartford Core Equity Fund Class R5
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- pomix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
T. Rowe Price Total Equity Market Index Fund
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- lglv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- rsp
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ogeax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
JPMorgan Equity Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ticrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ancfx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
American Funds Fundamental Investors® Class A
Expenses: 0.61% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »