Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$DFVS Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,127 Alternative Inverse funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- itaax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Short-Term Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- isze
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
iShares Edge MSCI Intl Size Factor ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- jasbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Janus Henderson Short-Term Bond Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pgbax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Principal Global Diversified Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- tedix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- plmax
- Mutual Fund
- Money Market
- World
PIMCO Emerging Markets Currency and Short-Term Investments Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »
- jgyax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
John Hancock Global Shareholder Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mzcix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Muzinich Credit Opportunities Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- eilbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Parametric TABS 1-to-10 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gsg
- ETF
- Commodities
- Broad
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- tixrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
TIAA-CREF 5-15 Year Laddered Tax-Exempt Bond Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tlrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Federated Total Return Bond Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- tolix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Global Equity
DWS RREEF Global Infrastructure Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »
- nmiex
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Northern Active M International Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- noigx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Northern International Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- nuem
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- hgoax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
The Hartford Growth Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- oarbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Oakmark Equity And Income Fund Service Class
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »