Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
6 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$DFPAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- thigx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Thornburg Core Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- prihx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
T. Rowe Price Intermediate Tax-Free High Yield Fund
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ryaix
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Inverse
Rydex Inverse NASDAQ-100® Strategy Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »
- rww
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Utilities
Invesco S&P Financials Revenue ETF
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »
- jgvax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Global Value Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pfncx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Low Duration Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- caapx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Ariel Appreciation Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mopix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
MainStay MacKay Small Cap Core Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- basax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Fund Advisor Shares
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- mnwcx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternatives
- Short
MFS Managed Wealth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »
- csa
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
VictoryShares US Small Cap Volatility Wtd ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- bhycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BlackRock High Yield Bond Portfolio Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eomyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Wells Fargo Omega Growth Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- arkw
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
ARK Next Generation Internet ETF
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- gmmax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Dynamic Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mviax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Praxis Value Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pcmvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Principal MidCap Value Fund I Class A
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- stfrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Wells Fargo Target 2040 Fund - Class A
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- hpf
- Mutual Fund
- Other
- Preferred Stock
John Hancock Preferred Income Fund II
Expenses: 2.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Preferred Stock Other fund. See why »