Diversification Rating
0 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
8 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$DEEF Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,369 International Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- flm
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Industrials
First Trust Global Engineering and Construction ETF
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »
- hrlax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fmiex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wasatch Global Value Fund⢠Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hsdcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Short Duration Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hsmsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Hartford Small Cap Value Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- twscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
American Century Strategic Allocation: Conservative Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- frsax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Floating Rate Strategic Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ihfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Integrity High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fvl
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
First Trust Value Line 100 Exchange-Traded Fund
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »