Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$DAGVX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 566 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tdfix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Transamerica Dividend Focused Class I
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- twqax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Transamerica Large Cap Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- hdgcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
The Hartford Dividend and Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fstkx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Federated MDT Large Cap Value Fund Service Shares
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pzfvx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
John Hancock Classic Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- vgrix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
JPMorgan Growth And Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- edow
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- aeyix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Century Equity Income Fund C Class
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- fdsbx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
AIG Focused Dividend Strategy Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »