Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$DAFRX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- nerax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sainx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Seix Corporate Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- emlcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- sihsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Guggenheim High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fghnx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Fidelity® Global High Income Fund
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- apibx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Yorktown Short Term Bond Fund Class Institutional
Expenses: 2.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mhobx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Global High Yield Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- oficx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco Intermediate Bond Factor Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bxfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Global Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »