CZA : Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF

CZA is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Blend with MODERATE fees.

CZA

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF

FI Score

46 /100

Diversification Rating

4 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

7 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare CZA vs PBNAX

34% FI Score
  • pbnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

PACE Strategic Fixed Income Investments Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs NAEFX

34% FI Score
  • naefx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

New Alternatives Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs NCHCX

34% FI Score
  • nchcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs MHIBX

34% FI Score
  • mhibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS High Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs MHICX

34% FI Score
  • mhicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs PCRCX

34% FI Score
  • pcrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

PIMCO CommodityRealReturn Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs AAAPX

34% FI Score
  • aaapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs AACFX

34% FI Score
  • aacfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Invesco Greater China Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs AAZAX

34% FI Score
  • aazax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund II Arizona Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs ACASX

34% FI Score
  • acasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Access Capital Community Investment Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs AFRCX

34% FI Score
  • afrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Floating Rate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs AIRR

34% FI Score
  • airr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

First Trust RBA American Industrial RenaissanceTM ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs APIUX

34% FI Score
  • apiux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs ARLCX

34% FI Score
  • arlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2035 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs ASICX

34% FI Score
  • asicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs AWSCX

34% FI Score
  • awscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs AXEAX

34% FI Score
  • axeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Columbia Contrarian Europe Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs AZMAX

34% FI Score
  • azmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

AllianzGI Emerging Markets Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs BCSAX

34% FI Score
  • bcsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Commodities
  • Broad

BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare CZA vs BEARX

34% FI Score
  • bearx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Federated Prudent Bear Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 2.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo