Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$CWGCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fgilx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Fidelity® Global Equity Income Fund
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- deqcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gggax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gicpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class AAA
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gmcix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
LMCG Global MultiCap Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sgapx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus SGA Global Growth I Class
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hgxax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Impact Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- camgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Cambiar Global Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ekgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »